Returning back to the Anthropic compiler attempt: one of the steps that the agent failed was the one that was more strongly related to the idea of memorization of what is in the pretraining set: the assembler. With extensive documentation, I can’t see any way Claude Code (and, even more, GPT5.3-codex, which is in my experience, for complex stuff, more capable) could fail at producing a working assembler, since it is quite a mechanical process. This is, I think, in contradiction with the idea that LLMs are memorizing the whole training set and uncompress what they have seen. LLMs can memorize certain over-represented documents and code, but while they can extract such verbatim parts of the code if prompted to do so, they don’t have a copy of everything they saw during the training set, nor they spontaneously emit copies of already seen code, in their normal operation. We mostly ask LLMs to create work that requires assembling different knowledge they possess, and the result is normally something that uses known techniques and patterns, but that is new code, not constituting a copy of some pre-existing code.
Wöchentlich die digitale Ausgabe des SPIEGEL inkl. E-Paper (PDF), Digital-Archiv und S+-Newsletter
。业内人士推荐heLLoword翻译官方下载作为进阶阅读
Skip 熱讀 and continue reading熱讀，详情可参考safew官方版本下载
Последние новости
Flutter 让这一切变得格外轻松——一套代码库，覆盖所有平台：iOS、Android、Web 和桌面。如果你想更进一步，flutter_gemma 是开源的，我们始终欢迎贡献者。